From AI Experiments to AI-Ready Security Operations
Security leaders keep hearing the same question: What is your AI strategy?
Many teams already use AI to summarize intelligence, draft reports, accelerate investigations, and cut repetitive work. These deliver real productivity gains, but they're only part of the picture. The bigger opportunity is using AI to identify risk faster, connect information, and sharpen decisions at scale.
That depends on something many organizations are still building: connected, governed, and accessible context. Security decisions rarely rest on a single data point. A threat alert means something different depending on the executive involved, the facility at risk, travel plans, and prior incidents. Yet that context is usually scattered across intelligence feeds, case management, travel tools, access control, spreadsheets, and email.
This is where AI initiatives fall short: a model is only as good as the data it can retrieve, and that data must be current, permissioned, and traceable. Fragmented information leads to fluent but incomplete answers — and in security, that can be worse than no answer at all.
The organizations getting the most from AI share one trait: the data needed to understand risk and coordinate response is connected, governed, and accessible. Their teams spend less time gathering context and more time acting on it.
The AI Readiness Assessment
Take the following assessment to evaluate how easily your team can access, connect, and use data across your security program.
For each action, estimate how long it would take your team to reliably complete it today.
People
Corporate security decisions often begin with a person: an executive, employee, threat actor, traveler, visitor, vendor, or person of interest. AI can only help when that person’s context is connected and available to it.
People
How long would it take to assemble a consolidated view of a threat actor, person of interest, or concerning individual — drawing on the relevant history across your systems?
Question 1 of 13
People
How long would it take to identify which executives, employees, or travelers currently face the greatest exposure, and explain why with supporting evidence?
Question 2 of 13
People
How long would it take to review the incidents, investigations, intelligence, communications, assessments, and outcomes associated with a specific individual?
Question 3 of 13
Places
Risk is rarely abstract. It is tied to facilities, offices, homes, event venues, travel destinations, routes, regions, and operating environments.
Places
How long would it take to identify which facilities, offices, or assets are affected by a breaking geopolitical, weather, crime, protest, or crisis event?
Question 4 of 13
Places
How long would it take to review the incidents, threats, investigations, risk assessments, and open actions associated with a specific location?
Question 5 of 13
Places
How long would it take to determine which sites represent the highest concentration of risk today, and support that assessment with evidence?
Question 6 of 13
Events
AI becomes useful when it can connect external signals to internal exposure. A breaking event only matters if you know who, what, and where it affects.
Events
How long would it take to assess how a specific threat actor or external event affects your organization, and support that assessment with source-linked evidence?
Question 7 of 13
Events
How long would it take to identify the employees, executives, travelers, facilities, events, and suppliers affected by an emerging crisis?
Question 8 of 13
Events
How long would it take to determine what has changed in your risk landscape over the last 30 days?
Question 9 of 13
Program Performance
AI should do more than help analysts write faster summaries. It should help security leaders see where the program is strong, where it is exposed, and where work gets stuck.
Program Performance
How long would it take to report on incident and investigation trends across business units, regions, facilities, incident types, or risk categories?
Question 10 of 13
Program Performance
How long would it take to identify where analysts spend the most time gathering, validating, or reconciling information?
Question 11 of 13
Program Performance
How long would it take to determine which workflows create the biggest operational bottlenecks, delays, duplicate work, or missed handoffs?
Question 12 of 13
Program Performance
How long would it take to identify the stakeholders affected by a security incident, investigation, or emerging risk, and give each team the information relevant to their role?
Question 13 of 13
Your AI readiness score is ready
Enter your details below to see how your organization stacks up — and where to focus next.